Which of the Following is Not a Recommended Characteristic for Incident Objectives

which of the following is not a recommended characteristic for incident objectives

Certainly, we can provide you with an in-depth explanation of each characteristic for incident objectives and then identify which one is not recommended. However, it’s important to note that all the characteristics mentioned in the previous response are generally recommended for effective incident objectives. None of them should be omitted or ignored.

Characteristic for Incident Objectives


Specificity is a crucial characteristic for incident objectives. Specific objectives clearly define what needs to be achieved during an incident response. They leave no room for ambiguity or misunderstanding. When objectives are specific, everyone involved knows exactly what they need to accomplish, which enhances coordination and reduces the chances of miscommunication. For instance, a specific objective might be to evacuate 500 people from a flooded area within the next two hours.


Measurable objectives provide a clear way to determine progress and success. By including quantifiable criteria, you can assess how close you are to achieving the objective at any given time. Measurable objectives are valuable for tracking performance and making data-driven decisions during an incident. For example, a measurable objective could be to distribute 1,000 emergency food packages to affected households by the end of the day.


Achievability ensures that objectives are realistic and attainable with the available resources, skills, and time. Setting unattainable goals can demoralize response teams and lead to resource wastage. Achievable objectives take into account the limitations and constraints of the situation. It’s important to strike a balance between ambition and realism. For instance, during a wildfire response, an achievable objective might be to contain the fire within a specified perimeter given the available firefighting resources.


Relevant objectives are aligned with the overall incident response strategy and the mission’s priorities. Objectives should directly contribute to addressing the incident and its impact. Irrelevant objectives can divert resources and attention away from critical tasks. To ensure relevance, regularly assess whether each objective supports the incident’s overarching goals.


Time-bound objectives have a defined timeframe within which they should be achieved. Timeframes create a sense of urgency and help prioritize tasks during an incident response. Without time-bound objectives, there may be a lack of focus and accountability. For instance, a time-bound objective could be to establish a temporary shelter for displaced residents within six hours of initiating the response.


Flexibility is essential because incident situations can evolve rapidly. While objectives should be specific, they should also allow for adaptation to changing circumstances. Flexibility ensures that response efforts can be adjusted in real-time to address emerging challenges or opportunities. For example, if weather conditions deteriorate during a search and rescue operation, flexibility allows response teams to modify their approach without abandoning the overall objective.

Clear Ownership:

Assigning responsibility for each objective to a specific individual or team is critical for accountability. Clear ownership ensures that someone is accountable for driving progress and making decisions related to that objective. Without clear ownership, tasks may fall through the cracks, and there may be confusion about who is responsible for what.

Linked to Strategy:

Incident objectives should align with and support the overall incident response strategy. Each objective should contribute to the larger goal of mitigating the incident’s impact. This alignment ensures that response efforts are coordinated and consistent with the overarching plan.

Consistent with Policy and Regulations:

Objectives must adhere to relevant laws, regulations, and organizational policies. Compliance is crucial to avoid legal or ethical issues that could arise during the incident response. Objectives that violate policies or regulations can lead to complications and potential liabilities.

Communicated Effectively:

Effective communication of objectives is essential to ensure that all relevant stakeholders are on the same page. Clear communication helps align efforts, prevents misunderstandings, and fosters a common understanding of what needs to be achieved. All response teams, management, and external agencies should be aware of the incident objectives.


When dealing with multiple objectives, it’s important to prioritize them based on their criticality and impact on the incident. Prioritization helps in allocating limited resources efficiently and ensuring that the most important tasks are addressed first. It also prevents response teams from spreading themselves too thin.

Feedback Loop:

Establishing a mechanism for ongoing feedback and assessment of objectives is crucial. Regular reviews of objectives allow for adjustments based on the evolving situation. This feedback loop ensures that objectives remain relevant and effective throughout the incident response.

S.M.A.R.T. Criteria:

The S.M.A.R.T. framework is a widely accepted guideline for setting effective objectives. It stands for Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-Bound. Adhering to these criteria helps ensure that objectives are well-defined and actionable.


In summary, all the characteristics mentioned above are recommended for incident objectives. Each characteristic plays a specific role in ensuring that objectives are clear, actionable, and aligned with the overall incident response strategy. Omitting any of these characteristics could lead to confusion, inefficiency, and a less effective response effort.